chris
22 years ago
The 1.1 million square foot PREIT property, hasnt undergone any
changes since the March 2003 acquiring of the major mall, despite the
newspapers and PREIT word which indicated that soon upgrades will
happen.
Nobody has taken serious interest in filling either the vacant
JCPenney or Sears anchors. As for retailers, The May Company could
open another Southern NJ Lord&Taylor store. I dont know if Burlington
Coat Factory, Kohls, Costco or Walmart were contacted but if they
were, they werent interested or found the area not adaptable. If they
werent contacted, then the Rouse (and now PREIT) isnt doing everything
to get new anchors.
Nordstrom, Bloomingdales, and Macy's will only consider flourishing
shopping centers with decent traffic. Taking a walk in the mall, I
noticed few more mom & pop stores replacing the national stores that
were once there. For Christmas season during the evening hours, mall
activity seemed more like what it should be such as an off season 11am
monday visit. Occupancies seem to be an issue with the vast mall 3/4
full. The San Francisco Music Box Company has been replaced by a
mom/pop gift shop with no changes to the storefront except the name.
Some other stores like Lechters were replaced with a local store,
other stores that had closed still had its name listed (such as Allied
Hobbies), others like Gantos (which has/had a exquisite storefront
still have the storefront, but the store remains closed without the
name, and others are altogether boarded with a wall, that have an
advertisement with Clear Channel's logo on the corner. Clear Channel
is making money off the serious vacancy issue, and of stores going out
of business?
I wonder if there is a directory kept, of all the stores that have
passed through the Echelon Mall since its opening in 1970. It would
be really vast list of stores and probably most that are totally out
of business across the country. Anyone remember The Canadiens?
Unfortunately with the occupancies, remaining businesses are still
scattered throughout the mall. The idea to strengthen the mall at
sections (such as between Boscov's and Strawbridge's) hasnt really
picked up. Some of the stores (closer to Penney's) like Motherhood
Maternity do have new storefronts and probably arent willing to invest
moving to the other side of the mall because it would be costly and
little in benefit long term. Others like Deck the Walls, which lack a
nice front anyways, could move elsewhere without much trouble, but
havent.
PREIT has mentioned likely changes. They originally pinned on putting
offices in the mall where JCPenney and Sears were anchored. I have
trouble understanding that because most businesses would seem to
prefer having offices with windows (and JCPenney and Sears lacked
that), and be off a good location. The Echelon Mall isnt conveniently
off major roads, though has ample parking. More parking that it can
ever fill. Offices dont have employees working on weekends usually,
and thus cars parked during weekends. Thus, offices would still be a
gaping hole to the image of the mall.
Over at the Hamilton Mall by the Jersey Shore, their newer mall is
proceeding in new flooring while the older Voorhees Echelon Mall is
tied in bureaucratic impediments.
PREIT has said they will wait until they get the 2 anchors (of
JCPenney and Sears) re-occupied now before any changes. Suppose, they
dont, does this mean the rest of the mall has to hemorrage more stores
and customers?
Despite this, some advertising for Echelon Mall is being done now
currently via Comcast. In my opinion, the mall off county roads
really should be scaled down. With the addition of Sears, it was
overmalled and oversaturated to a point, but the existing parts never
got the needed facelift and boost they needed. What a disaster. Then
it lost Sears, which hurt JCPenney, which put in the poorest position
of the mall (relative to Boscovs and Strawbridges), now was adjacent
to the Sears carcass. Penney closed. The Penneys and Sears anchors
site(s) are at the back of the mall, and are poorly situated.
Thus, suppose the best solution would be to tear down the Penney's and
Sears sites, and strengthen the remaining of the mall. And later
redevelop. It was mentioned Sears and JCPenney owned those sites.
Assuming such, would they be uncooperative that they wouldnt want it
torn down but insist the structure of those sites remain intact and
simply find a new owner?
For a new anchor, if Walmart or any store wanted to open at Echelon,
the optimal side is not where Sears or JCPenney are, but between
Boscov's and Strawbridge's off Somerdale road. This would equate to
the second level of the mall and only an entrance to the mall via the
second level. This location is in the middle of the mall (which is
good in mall location) and visible from the largest road that runs
through the mall.
Even if Walmart, a movie theater, or some group looking to put up
offices wants that space, the existing JCPenney or Sears would
probably need to be torn down and new accomodating structure would be
into place. Its the American way. For example, Walgreens which
wanted a site in Cherry Hill paid the owners of a diner to close and
move elsewhere. Rather than Walgreens converting the diner into a
pharmacy by exterior changes, they tore the entire diner down, and are
building the Walgreens from scratch to model other Walgreens across
the country.
It would be dissapointing to see the Sears anchor (which is less than
5 years old) be torned down. Since the shape of the structure is in
good condition, it is very unlikely that it would be torned down (and
redeveloped)?
changes since the March 2003 acquiring of the major mall, despite the
newspapers and PREIT word which indicated that soon upgrades will
happen.
Nobody has taken serious interest in filling either the vacant
JCPenney or Sears anchors. As for retailers, The May Company could
open another Southern NJ Lord&Taylor store. I dont know if Burlington
Coat Factory, Kohls, Costco or Walmart were contacted but if they
were, they werent interested or found the area not adaptable. If they
werent contacted, then the Rouse (and now PREIT) isnt doing everything
to get new anchors.
Nordstrom, Bloomingdales, and Macy's will only consider flourishing
shopping centers with decent traffic. Taking a walk in the mall, I
noticed few more mom & pop stores replacing the national stores that
were once there. For Christmas season during the evening hours, mall
activity seemed more like what it should be such as an off season 11am
monday visit. Occupancies seem to be an issue with the vast mall 3/4
full. The San Francisco Music Box Company has been replaced by a
mom/pop gift shop with no changes to the storefront except the name.
Some other stores like Lechters were replaced with a local store,
other stores that had closed still had its name listed (such as Allied
Hobbies), others like Gantos (which has/had a exquisite storefront
still have the storefront, but the store remains closed without the
name, and others are altogether boarded with a wall, that have an
advertisement with Clear Channel's logo on the corner. Clear Channel
is making money off the serious vacancy issue, and of stores going out
of business?
I wonder if there is a directory kept, of all the stores that have
passed through the Echelon Mall since its opening in 1970. It would
be really vast list of stores and probably most that are totally out
of business across the country. Anyone remember The Canadiens?
Unfortunately with the occupancies, remaining businesses are still
scattered throughout the mall. The idea to strengthen the mall at
sections (such as between Boscov's and Strawbridge's) hasnt really
picked up. Some of the stores (closer to Penney's) like Motherhood
Maternity do have new storefronts and probably arent willing to invest
moving to the other side of the mall because it would be costly and
little in benefit long term. Others like Deck the Walls, which lack a
nice front anyways, could move elsewhere without much trouble, but
havent.
PREIT has mentioned likely changes. They originally pinned on putting
offices in the mall where JCPenney and Sears were anchored. I have
trouble understanding that because most businesses would seem to
prefer having offices with windows (and JCPenney and Sears lacked
that), and be off a good location. The Echelon Mall isnt conveniently
off major roads, though has ample parking. More parking that it can
ever fill. Offices dont have employees working on weekends usually,
and thus cars parked during weekends. Thus, offices would still be a
gaping hole to the image of the mall.
Over at the Hamilton Mall by the Jersey Shore, their newer mall is
proceeding in new flooring while the older Voorhees Echelon Mall is
tied in bureaucratic impediments.
PREIT has said they will wait until they get the 2 anchors (of
JCPenney and Sears) re-occupied now before any changes. Suppose, they
dont, does this mean the rest of the mall has to hemorrage more stores
and customers?
Despite this, some advertising for Echelon Mall is being done now
currently via Comcast. In my opinion, the mall off county roads
really should be scaled down. With the addition of Sears, it was
overmalled and oversaturated to a point, but the existing parts never
got the needed facelift and boost they needed. What a disaster. Then
it lost Sears, which hurt JCPenney, which put in the poorest position
of the mall (relative to Boscovs and Strawbridges), now was adjacent
to the Sears carcass. Penney closed. The Penneys and Sears anchors
site(s) are at the back of the mall, and are poorly situated.
Thus, suppose the best solution would be to tear down the Penney's and
Sears sites, and strengthen the remaining of the mall. And later
redevelop. It was mentioned Sears and JCPenney owned those sites.
Assuming such, would they be uncooperative that they wouldnt want it
torn down but insist the structure of those sites remain intact and
simply find a new owner?
For a new anchor, if Walmart or any store wanted to open at Echelon,
the optimal side is not where Sears or JCPenney are, but between
Boscov's and Strawbridge's off Somerdale road. This would equate to
the second level of the mall and only an entrance to the mall via the
second level. This location is in the middle of the mall (which is
good in mall location) and visible from the largest road that runs
through the mall.
Even if Walmart, a movie theater, or some group looking to put up
offices wants that space, the existing JCPenney or Sears would
probably need to be torn down and new accomodating structure would be
into place. Its the American way. For example, Walgreens which
wanted a site in Cherry Hill paid the owners of a diner to close and
move elsewhere. Rather than Walgreens converting the diner into a
pharmacy by exterior changes, they tore the entire diner down, and are
building the Walgreens from scratch to model other Walgreens across
the country.
It would be dissapointing to see the Sears anchor (which is less than
5 years old) be torned down. Since the shape of the structure is in
good condition, it is very unlikely that it would be torned down (and
redeveloped)?